A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national awareness next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, request to make their family members residence. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful group has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been called meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to arranging regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.